NOW IN ROCK NEW VENTURES BATCH 10

Your engineering already adopted AI.Can you prove it's getting better?

ScaleQuality scores your maturity, measures what AI really shipped, and sends agents to close the gaps. With evidence, not estimates.

No credit card. Real engineering signals from day one.

Real cost, attribution and risk of AI in your stack. Measured, not estimated.

Trusted by engineering leaders at

AgibankiConnectionsAB InBevATEK GroupBemol DigitalAgibankiConnectionsAB InBevATEK GroupBemol Digital
WHO IT'S FOR

Built for engineering leaders who own outcomes.

VPs & Directors of Engineering
Heads of Quality / Quality Engineering
Platform & Engineering Excellence teams
CTOs at scaling tech companies
High Impact Individual Contributors
Team Leads & Tech Leads
WHY THIS MATTERS

AI shipped. Governance didn't.

Engineering already adopted AI. What's missing is the layer that turns its real signals (cost, attribution, risk, deploy readiness) into decisions leadership can defend.

Without it, leaders pay four silent costs:

AI cost is invoiced, not understood

Provider bills land monthly. Nobody knows which team consumed what, which agents drove which PRs, or whether spend tracked with output.

Quality stays a feeling, not a measurement

Teams self-report maturity. Leaders rely on intuition. Real signals from SonarCloud, Jira and the boards never reach the executive call.

Deploy readiness is an opinion, not a call

Critical bugs, incidents and hotfixes live in dashboards nobody reads. "Are we ready to ship?" gets answered in the standup, not with data.

Governance fragments across teams and tools

Each BU runs its own standard, its own AI providers, its own agents. No org-wide visibility, no way to scale governance, and no way to defend the decision in front of the board.

ScaleQuality closes the loop.

THE MATURITY MODEL

Maturity is the spine of the loop.

ScaleQuality scores where your engineering stands today. Then the loop moves you up, level by level.

12 domains · 30+ gates · 5 levels of maturity

AI ENGINEERING GOVERNANCE

The three questions every leader asks about their AI.

Cost, trust, exposure: measured per team, never per person. And when there's a gap, an agent opens the pull request to close it.

Am I getting my money's worth?

$19.6K

of your AI spend became code that stuck

Can I trust the code AI writes?

High

governed PRs · human-reviewed before merge

Is there shadow AI in my codebase?

2 repos

ungoverned AI detected

Gap detected? The loop closes it, and it's governed.

The governance loop

Dispatch

Agent · Code Health

Governed PR

PR #42 · never auto-merged

Proof

coverage 71% → 88% · durable

re-measures durability · back to ROI · continuous
Autonomy you defineSensitive-path guardrailsHuman review required

A fleet of governed agents

Gate-fixCI-fixCode HealthTestsContract· soon
THE PLATFORM

Three fronts, measured continuously.

Quality, deploy readiness and AI governance, connected to the same engineering signals, evaluated against the same evidence, and surfaced in the same boardroom-ready view.

EVIDENCE & ROI

Quality gates backed by real signals

Maturity measured against 30+ quality gates and the engineering signals your tools already emit. Every gap is translated into projected financial impact and a defensible priority for leadership and the board.

What you get

Evidence-based scoring · ROI projection · Aligned / Mismatch validation via SonarCloud

PRODUCTION READINESS

An objective deploy-readiness call

Know if a team or release is ready to ship, with auditable confidence based on connected data. 8 criteria across quality, board signals, risk and confidence converge into one executive call.

What you get

Ready / Ready with warnings / Not ready · 8 criteria · critical bugs, incidents and hotfixes from the board

AI ENGINEERING GOVERNANCE

Govern AI adoption without scaling risk

Measure if AI adoption is improving quality, or quietly raising cost, complexity and risk. Real cost via provider admin APIs, bottom-up attribution per team, and per-agent governance with autonomy, human review and guardrails.

What you get

Real cost · Bottom-up attribution · Per-agent autonomy, review % and guardrails

Connected to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure Repos, Jira, Azure Boards, SonarCloud, Anthropic and Cursor. Linear, Asana and Businessmap are next.

HOW IT WORKS

Connect. Measure. Close the gap. Prove.

Four steps, then it runs again. Every pass measures real signals, closes a real gap, and proves the impact in your own code.

01

Connect

Plug your repos, boards, SonarCloud and AI provider admin keys (Anthropic, Cursor). One admin key per team, bottom-up, isolated, encrypted at rest.

02

Measure

Maturity scored across 12 domains and 30+ gates. Production readiness against 8 criteria. AI cost, tokens and code durability captured continuously from real signals, never estimates.

03

Close the gap

When a gate fails, an expert agent is dispatched. It clones the repo, writes the fix, and opens a governed pull request. Human review always required, nothing auto-merges.

04

Prove

The agent re-measures. Coverage rises, the gate flips to met, maturity moves up. The impact is proven in your own code, not a number you typed in.

Then it measures again. The loop does not end at a dashboard.

Guided Demo

See ScaleQuality operating with your engineering data

Our team will walk you through a personalized demo tailored to your organization's engineering challenges.

Enterprise Security

Built secure from day one.

ScaleQuality measures your team, never your developers. Zero code retention, and our AI never trains on your code. Production-grade security on every layer, every action auditable.

Security Infrastructure

Fully implemented · Production ready

Multi-tenant data isolation
Role-based access control (RBAC)
SSO enterprise (SAML & OIDC)
Two-factor authentication (TOTP)
Secure httpOnly token refresh
Audit logging with CSV/JSON export
Rate limiting & WAF protection
Least-privilege OAuth (GitHub, Jira)
Zero Code Retention: We analyze, but never store or keep code
Our system is code-aware, not code-storing
Non-Model-Learning AI: Our AI uses pre-built assessment models
It never trains on customer data. Safe by design
AWS Activate
Verified startup · cloud infrastructure
Rock New Ventures
Batch 10 · 2025–2026
GUIDED TRIAL

What you'll see in your first 7 days.

Real AI cost per team, with bottom-up attribution from actual repo activity
Production Readiness as an executive call (Ready / Ready with warnings / Not ready)
Maturity across 12 domains, validated against real SonarCloud, Jira and Azure Boards signals
Technical gaps translated into financial projection ready to defend in front of the board

No setup theater. Real value from day one.

Start Free Trial
BUILD VS BUY

Don't spend your engineering rebuilding AI governance.

Building the first dashboard is easy. Maintaining attribution, AI cost intelligence, code durability, risk models, agent guardrails, PR governance and audit trails is the real cost.

Build it in-house

  • Your team builds and maintains the integrations, metrics, rules and dashboards
  • Internal token and agent cost grows without predictability
  • Metrics become BI without a methodology behind them
  • Internal agents need prompting, evaluation and governance
  • Hard to prove whether AI created value or just rework

With ScaleQuality

  • A ready layer connected to the stack you already use
  • An outcome-oriented model, with per-agent guardrails and caps
  • Metrics tied to quality, risk, readiness and ROI
  • Expert agents with a governed flow and evidence in every PR
  • Measures durability, rework, shadow AI and trust

Build it, and you pull engineering off the core to maintain a layer ScaleQuality already ships as its core.

Keeping it true is a product, not a project. That product is ScaleQuality.

THE COST OF WAITING

The question isn't whether you can build it.It's what it costs to keep flying blind.

Shadow AI you can't price

AI is already writing code in repos no one governs. You can't manage a risk you can't even see.

Rework you already pay for

A share of what your AI ships gets reverted or rewritten. That waste is on your invoice whether you measure it or not.

Decay you meet in production

Speed hides slow erosion. Without durability data, the bill arrives as incidents and on-call nights.

A board answer you can't defend

When leadership asks if AI made engineering better, 'it feels faster' is not evidence.

ScaleQuality turns each of these into a number from your own code. The quality intelligence layer for AI-driven engineering.

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 7-day free trial. No credit card required.

Team

Discovery: essentials only

$199/mo
  • Evidence-based Quality Gates (12 domains, 30+ gates)
  • ROI projection from technical gaps
  • Source control, board and SonarCloud integrations
  • Multi-Source Intelligence Engine™
  • AI Advisor (50 queries/mo)
  • 1 Business Unit · up to 3 Teams
Most Popular

Business

Operating quality at scale

$599/mo
  • Everything in Team
  • AI Footprint: every AI tool's cost, beyond just code
  • Release Risk Intelligence (SonarCloud + financial impact)
  • Tech Radar with ORG → BU → Team inheritance
  • Execution Layer: drag & drop Gantt with Jira sync
  • 1 Quality Agent: AI Policy enforcement
  • Scaffolding automation
  • Unlimited AI Advisor

Enterprise

Complete governance layer

Custom

Self-hosted, Private or Dedicated Cloud available
  • Everything in Business
  • Full AI Engineering Governance (cost · efficiency · risk lenses)
  • Autonomous Quality Agents (dispatch → PR, governed)
  • Production Readiness (8 criteria, Ready / Warnings / Not ready)
  • Bottom-up AI Attribution (real cost per team via repo activity)
  • Multi-provider AI + BU and Org rollups
  • SSO/SAML · MFA · RBAC · Audit log
  • Dedicated support · priority integrations

Need more Business Units? Add extras for $29/BU/mo.

Not sure which plan is right for your Org?

Under the Hood

What powers ScaleQuality

AI Engineering Governance

  • Real cost, tokens and activity from Anthropic and Cursor admin APIs
  • Per-agent autonomy, human-review rate and guardrails
  • Three lenses on AI adoption: cost, efficiency and risk

Bottom-up Attribution

  • Team's AI cost computed from actual repo activity share
  • Workspace and bot-user mapping per agent
  • No top-down allocation, no surveillance of individuals

Production Readiness

  • Ready / Ready with warnings / Not ready / Insufficient data
  • 8 criteria across quality, board signals, risk and confidence
  • Critical bugs, incidents and hotfixes from Jira & Azure Boards

Multi-Source Intelligence Engine™

  • Grounded in CISQ, McKinsey, Stripe, DORA & Octoverse
  • Financial engine recalculates ROI continuously
  • Powers every recommendation, score and insight

Evidence-Based Maturity

  • 12 domains, 30+ quality gates
  • Validated against connected engineering signals
  • Aligned / Mismatch detection via SonarCloud

Risk Intelligence

  • Risk Exposure scoring (security, reliability, coverage)
  • Release guardrails with financial impact estimation
  • Business Risk Traceability via tracker items

Execution Layer

  • Drag & drop Gantt timeline with Jira sync
  • AI-generated epics & stories from maturity gaps
  • Roadmap that lives outside slides

Governance Layer

  • Tech Radar with ORG → BU → Team inheritance
  • Standards that evolve with maturity
  • BU and Org rollups across every team

Integration Hub

  • GitHub · GitLab · Bitbucket · Azure Repos · Jira · Azure Boards · SonarCloud
  • Anthropic · Cursor · Windsurf and Antigravity next
  • Linear · Businessmap · Asana shipping in the next release